Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
cooney21's profile
Bill Cooney
Bill Cooney
Bill Cooney
@cooney21

Tweets

Bill Cooney

@cooney21

Joined March 2011

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. RJR4D1C47‏ @rjradical 3 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @cooney21 @qw_jessie

      You turn a chart like that in were I work it would be dismissed. It doesn’t back up the claim that there are multiple overlaps. It shows that 222 people out of a supposed 100 had issues and only 3 on the non side were studied.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Bill Cooney‏ @cooney21 3 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @rjradical @qw_jessie

      Either you (and your co-workers, I guess) don't understand the chart, or you are being disingenuous. They are percentages. 75 out of 100, 55 out of 100, etc. It's not 222 b/c it's not cumulative. The numbers on the "non" side are low only b/c so few intact boys have problems. #i2

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    3. RJR4D1C47‏ @rjradical 3 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @cooney21 @qw_jessie

      The chart says out of 100,correct? The numbers add up to 222 with no explanation of multiple incidents to 1 individual. Where I work you can’t go more th 15 feet without running into a PhD. The chart is horrible done. From that chart can you deduce how many people had multiple 1/

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. RJR4D1C47‏ @rjradical 3 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @rjradical @cooney21 @qw_jessie

      2/ailments and which multiple ailments happened? Take 35 will have post op hemorrhaging. How many of those will not breastfeed. You don’t know. It could be all at least 15 to maintain the 25 to reach 100. That’s why the chart is worthless.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Bill Cooney‏ @cooney21 3 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @rjradical @qw_jessie

      Seems like your real problem with the chart is that no rational person weighing the pros and cons of circumcision would look at it & conclude circumcising an infant would be a good idea. #i2

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    6. RJR4D1C47‏ @rjradical 3 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @cooney21 @qw_jessie

      No it’s riddled with incomplete data. 75 kids won’t breastfeed. How many of thos 100 moms were going to breast feed? Also, anyone making a decision off a chart on twitter shouldn’t be making those kind of decisions.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Bill Cooney‏ @cooney21 3 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @rjradical @qw_jessie

      Again, it's a percentage. Out of 100 boys circumcised, 75 don't readily breastfeed afterward & 25 do. 35 will have post-op hemorrhaging, 65 won't. There's a degree of overlap (10%-35%), but precisely how much is beyond the scope of the chart. Not 222 individuals. Percentages.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    8. Bill Cooney‏ @cooney21 3 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @cooney21 @rjradical @qw_jessie

      Same on the right side of the chart. It's not that "only 3 were studied" as you previously suggested. Those are percentages too. If you still don't get it, try talking to the PhDs at work. Or a 4th grade math teacher.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    9. RJR4D1C47‏ @rjradical 3 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @cooney21 @qw_jessie

      That link is also the information in the paperwork you need to fill out at the hospital when you want a circumcision for ones son and should been the counter point in the first place. Actually leaving the other 97 or 98% out it incomplete data 1/

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. RJR4D1C47‏ @rjradical 3 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @rjradical @cooney21 @qw_jessie

      2/unless the study was done over a period of time and followed all 100 subjects to the time they could get one on their own it’s fallible or inconclusive data. Because it’s either a guess or they looked a different group.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Bill Cooney‏ @cooney21 4 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @rjradical @qw_jessie

      Not "100 subjects". Percentages. The 97%-98% weren't "left out." They are healthy, problem-free intact boys, who never had a UTI or needed or wanted a circumcision, ever. Death risk alone (low as it may be) makes elective circumcision of an infant unethical. Right? #i2pic.twitter.com/iB3DXpbrGu

      8:47 AM - 4 Feb 2018
      • 1 Like
      • Patrick Van Negri
      0 replies 0 retweets 1 like

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info