"Hmmm... this article about vaginas doesn't say *anything* about dicks or circumcision! I must right this injustice by bringing up both!" Who's the asshole again? Oh, right: YOU.https://twitter.com/cooney21/status/933186026289250307 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @KhazWolf
Yes. Any attempt to hijack a conversation to a completely different topic is rude. If the original were about penises, I'd have the very same reaction if someone tried to make it about vaginas.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @whatdivawants @KhazWolf
The article's point is that irrational denigration & shaming of natural female genitalia is wrong. Correct. But it is the same irrational denigration & shaming of natural male genitalia that makes all
#MGM possible. Given the way US OB-GYNs tear apart boys' penises...#i2pic.twitter.com/ycoMA3M9QK
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I agree on all counts. Howver, hijacking a person's thread to include your own pet topic is rude, at best. It makes you the bad guy in the story, even if you make a valid point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Glad you agree on the substantive issue. But I didn't "hijack" anything, I offered valid comments that make valid points about hypocrisy & double standards on the same subject matter: natural genitals.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.