"Hmmm... this article about vaginas doesn't say *anything* about dicks or circumcision! I must right this injustice by bringing up both!" Who's the asshole again? Oh, right: YOU.https://twitter.com/cooney21/status/933186026289250307 …
The article's point is that irrational denigration & shaming of natural female genitalia is wrong. Correct. But it is the same irrational denigration & shaming of natural male genitalia that makes all #MGM possible. Given the way US OB-GYNs tear apart boys' penises... #i2pic.twitter.com/ycoMA3M9QK
-
-
it is fair & not off-topic to point out the double standard in an article by a US OB/GYN about not shaming natural female genitals. Respect for natural genitalia is not a zero-sum game. Opposition to male body shaming doesn't cost opponents of female body shaming a thing.
#i2 -
It is off topic, though. Subject is VULVA / VAGINAS. Penises, even baby ones that I agree shouldn't be cut, is NOT ON TOPIC. Please, stop trying to justify asahattery.pic.twitter.com/jNSJJTu5lr
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree on all counts. Howver, hijacking a person's thread to include your own pet topic is rude, at best. It makes you the bad guy in the story, even if you make a valid point.
-
Glad you agree on the substantive issue. But I didn't "hijack" anything, I offered valid comments that make valid points about hypocrisy & double standards on the same subject matter: natural genitals.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.