"[U]ntil a consensus is reached in the Muslim world, the status of female genital cutting as a 'religious' or 'cultural' practice will depend on each community’s local evaluation of secondary Islamic scriptures. Dawoodi Bohra clerics view the practice as religious." #i2
-
-
Replying to @cooney21 @Scripteladora and
Although these points are sufficient to show your specific views are incorrect, I suggest you read the entire article from which they're taken. And when you find you are unable to explain what's wrong with Professor Earp's comparative analysis, reconsider your all-caps rant.
#i22 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
None of my views are incorrect. You just spew propaganda and fear-mongering and expect it to stick. It doesn't
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Scripteladora @KyleChenIntact and
Virtually ALL of your views related to
#circumcision are incorrect. You obviously didn't bother to read the article I sent you - by the leading#Yale bioethicist on this subject - otherwise you'd realize that your views have been *demonstrated* to be incorrect.#i21 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
You're missing one crucial point I used to believe your propaganda ( I started 14 until 26years old)... then I did my research because your propaganda is too far fetched and I started to see the gaps in it. You're so brainwahsed you cant even properly analyze it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scripteladora @KyleChenIntact and
You were opposed to
#circumcision for 12 years? Prove it. You do realize what "proof" is right? That's when someone points to medical evidence or other objective facts in support of their position, instead of continually making things up the way you've done.#i22 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
I didn't make anything up, I know a few articles and my science is sound. I am not here to support medical circumcision ( which I still don't support)... I am here to fight anti-semitim
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Scripteladora @KyleChenIntact and
For someone who (still) doesn't support medical
#circumcision, as a result of 12 years of having been an intactivist, you've actually demonstrated that you know very little about the science & about the arguments against the practice.#i22 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @Scripteladora and
As 1 obvious example, no one who ever ended 12 years of intactivism because she was upset with the "hypocrisy" of an anti-FGM person who circumcised her son would lead with "it's nothing like
#FGM" the way you did. Do you now see how you have ZERO credibility, or should I go on?1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
Back then I was Ignorant and bought your pseudo-science FGM is very different and far more invasive, furthermore, the reasons are different. Teenagers ( like I was) are more susceptible to fear-mongering propaganda( Just look at poor Greta Tunberg. You're just another
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Is there a specific, credible reason for your conversion away from intactivism coming any time soon, or are you just going to continue making things up, not showing any evidence you were ever opposed to #circumcision, not saying who would remember you & attacking Greta Tunberg?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.