"Both male and female circumcision are mentioned in the Hadith. Based on their reading of the relevant passages, some Muslim authorities state that 'circumcision' of both sexes is recommended or even obligatory, while others draw a different conclusion."https://quillette.com/2017/08/15/female-genital-mutilation-health-benefits-problem-medicalizing-morality/ …
-
-
Replying to @cooney21 @Scripteladora and
"[U]ntil a consensus is reached in the Muslim world, the status of female genital cutting as a 'religious' or 'cultural' practice will depend on each community’s local evaluation of secondary Islamic scriptures. Dawoodi Bohra clerics view the practice as religious."
#i21 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @Scripteladora and
Although these points are sufficient to show your specific views are incorrect, I suggest you read the entire article from which they're taken. And when you find you are unable to explain what's wrong with Professor Earp's comparative analysis, reconsider your all-caps rant.
#i22 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
None of my views are incorrect. You just spew propaganda and fear-mongering and expect it to stick. It doesn't
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Scripteladora @KyleChenIntact and
Virtually ALL of your views related to
#circumcision are incorrect. You obviously didn't bother to read the article I sent you - by the leading#Yale bioethicist on this subject - otherwise you'd realize that your views have been *demonstrated* to be incorrect.#i21 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
You're missing one crucial point I used to believe your propaganda ( I started 14 until 26years old)... then I did my research because your propaganda is too far fetched and I started to see the gaps in it. You're so brainwahsed you cant even properly analyze it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scripteladora @KyleChenIntact and
You were opposed to
#circumcision for 12 years? Prove it. You do realize what "proof" is right? That's when someone points to medical evidence or other objective facts in support of their position, instead of continually making things up the way you've done.#i22 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
I didn't make anything up, I know a few articles and my science is sound. I am not here to support medical circumcision ( which I still don't support)... I am here to fight anti-semitim
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Scripteladora @KyleChenIntact and
For someone who (still) doesn't support medical
#circumcision, as a result of 12 years of having been an intactivist, you've actually demonstrated that you know very little about the science & about the arguments against the practice.#i22 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
I know the science which is why I oppose your movement. And I wasn't an Intactivist because your bunch is anti-semitic, I never claimed my culture was better than other's culture or that people were cruel. I just really believed in that " crippled nonsense propaganda"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You "know the science" but can't cite to or refute any of it - or even come close to getting it right.
You think we're anti-semitic but can't point to a single instance of any intactivist actually being anti-semitic.
Do you really have no idea how unconvincing your story is? #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.