Exactly. And the "she wouldn't know comment" is obviously baseless. FGM is also deemed a religious requirement. That #circumcision might be medically necessary (although this is extremely rare) simply cannot justify forcing it on a healthy infant.
-
-
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
FGM HAS NO RELIGIOUS BASIS, it's a sexist procedure that has no scriptural fundament in ANY RELIGION. There's nothing in TORAH, NOTHING IN THE BIBLE, NOTHING IN QURAN AND HADDITHS OF the Muslims... stop comparing the uncomparable... there is no religious background for FGM
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Scripteladora @KyleChenIntact and
"Both male and female circumcision are mentioned in the Hadith. Based on their reading of the relevant passages, some Muslim authorities state that 'circumcision' of both sexes is recommended or even obligatory, while others draw a different conclusion."https://quillette.com/2017/08/15/female-genital-mutilation-health-benefits-problem-medicalizing-morality/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @Scripteladora and
"[U]ntil a consensus is reached in the Muslim world, the status of female genital cutting as a 'religious' or 'cultural' practice will depend on each community’s local evaluation of secondary Islamic scriptures. Dawoodi Bohra clerics view the practice as religious."
#i21 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @Scripteladora and
Although these points are sufficient to show your specific views are incorrect, I suggest you read the entire article from which they're taken. And when you find you are unable to explain what's wrong with Professor Earp's comparative analysis, reconsider your all-caps rant.
#i22 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
None of my views are incorrect. You just spew propaganda and fear-mongering and expect it to stick. It doesn't
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Scripteladora @KyleChenIntact and
Virtually ALL of your views related to
#circumcision are incorrect. You obviously didn't bother to read the article I sent you - by the leading#Yale bioethicist on this subject - otherwise you'd realize that your views have been *demonstrated* to be incorrect.#i21 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
You're missing one crucial point I used to believe your propaganda ( I started 14 until 26years old)... then I did my research because your propaganda is too far fetched and I started to see the gaps in it. You're so brainwahsed you cant even properly analyze it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scripteladora @KyleChenIntact and
You were opposed to
#circumcision for 12 years? Prove it. You do realize what "proof" is right? That's when someone points to medical evidence or other objective facts in support of their position, instead of continually making things up the way you've done.#i22 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
I started to be an activist after I read Waris Dyrie book a Rose in the Desert where she tells her story of FGM... I then read a news article she was a hypocrite for circumcising her boy and I went downhill. I bought into the nonsense. Until I started seeing your inconsistencies
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Your "activism" sounds like everything else you've written: a self-serving figment of your imagination. Your anecdote makes no sense as a reason why you started to be opposed to male #circumcision but then stopped. Real intactivists know it's that hypocrisy that fuels us. #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.