You’re generalizing from an anecdote. Even if you can find one man whose subjective individual experience was improved, there are others whose experience was harmed greatly. That’s why it should be up to the individual, like in the case you presented.
-
-
Replying to @KyleChenIntact @realChaim_Rubin and
Exactly. And the "she wouldn't know comment" is obviously baseless. FGM is also deemed a religious requirement. That
#circumcision might be medically necessary (although this is extremely rare) simply cannot justify forcing it on a healthy infant.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
. I just looked up the origin of her statement She was talking about 3rd world countries with poor hygiene &poor skills Although you cite opposing opinions, the public health benefits of circumcision are undisputable
4 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @realChaim_Rubin @cooney21 and
AIDS risk drastically decreases in circumcised males in HIV hotpsot countries
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scripteladora @realChaim_Rubin and
If that was true then USA would have less STD’s.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @RockerMan_198 @Scripteladora and
Indeed. To suggest
#circumcision "drastically decreases" AIDS risk is irresponsible, utterly unsupported nonsense. And of course, infant circumcision can do nothing to decrease the patient's risk of an STD.#i23 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @RockerMan_198 @cooney21 and
You0re both wrong and have no point. Research shows otherwise
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Scripteladora @RockerMan_198 and
Like everything else you've said, the proposition that
#circumcision "drastically" reduces "AIDS risk" or HIV transmission - or anything other than sexual pleasure - is totally unsupported nonsense.#i21 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @RockerMan_198 and
No. I's actually backed up by research...wha is not backed up by research is your fear-mongering propaganda and obsession with pleasure. In fact many men have it removed because they can't orgasm because the foreskin prevents stimulus during coitus of the actual area that is most
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Again, you fail to cite to research to support your utter nonsense for only one reason: because there is none. What women and men who've actually experienced the foreskin have to say about it (& its loss) is far different from what you say: http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.