Not as likely though as females.
-
-
-
Replying to @KyleChenIntact @AKMcTavish and
. She wouldn't know Many thousands of men are circumcised as adults because of trauma, other lesions,or religious conversion Not true of FGM btw Their experience &that of their partners is overwhelmingly neutral to positive Here is a very serious convert to Judaism writingpic.twitter.com/xcJsF4ATpo
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @realChaim_Rubin @AKMcTavish and
You’re generalizing from an anecdote. Even if you can find one man whose subjective individual experience was improved, there are others whose experience was harmed greatly. That’s why it should be up to the individual, like in the case you presented.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @KyleChenIntact @realChaim_Rubin and
Exactly. And the "she wouldn't know comment" is obviously baseless. FGM is also deemed a religious requirement. That
#circumcision might be medically necessary (although this is extremely rare) simply cannot justify forcing it on a healthy infant.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
. I just looked up the origin of her statement She was talking about 3rd world countries with poor hygiene &poor skills Although you cite opposing opinions, the public health benefits of circumcision are undisputable
4 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @realChaim_Rubin @KyleChenIntact and
What I've cited is the clear international medical consensus, which is that the public health benefits of
#circumcision are dubious & questionable at best. That is why not a single medical organization in the world recommends forcing circumcision on a child.#i27 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @realChaim_Rubin and
Understandably not mandatory, but according to WebMD...pic.twitter.com/pdZ2BOc4l4
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @COPIA_COPMA1 @cooney21 and
That doesn't cover the harm done. You can find medical benefits of cutting off many body parts.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Harm? You mean the subjective claim of reduced sensitivity which 99.99999% of circumcised men don't experience or of which they're unaware? Oh, yeah, I forgot about that terrible harm. Sorry.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
The foreskin is innervated. As others taking your side have pointed out, removing it necessarily reduces sensitivity. That's an irrefutable objective fact, & conclusive evidence of harm. #i2 #HisBodyHisChoice
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.