Dr Paul Tinari did an MRI study that showed that #circumcision has a permanent, negative effect on the brain. https://circumcision.org/circumcision-permanently-alters-the-brain/ … He wasn't allowed to publish only because "any attempt to study the adverse effects of circumcision was strictly prohibited." #i2 #AAP19
-
-
Replying to @blue_wave_unite @quill_monger and
I met the small band of people behind this ridiculous website in
#Chicago at#AAP17. We have them on video chanting "My Body My Choice." It was a Freudian slip that tells you everything you need to know about their complete lack of both intelligence and#ethics.#i21 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @blue_wave_unite and
From THEIR article: "The author of this study, Dr. Paul Tinari, claims that he was forcefully circumcised by a Catholic priest and a Jewish mohel for masturbating. I don’t doubt that he was abused by his caretakers ..." Thanks for admitting the obvious:
#circumcision =#abuse2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @blue_wave_unite and
The "point" about Canadian bias is bizarre. Regardless of what the
#circumcision rate is in Canada, or whether insurance pays for it there, the fact is there are many Canadian doctors who have circumcised children who are therefore desperate to avoid proof that it is traumatic.1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @blue_wave_unite and
Same for the "point" about deleted records. If they're damning, are we really to believe that doctors and hospital administrators wouldn't have destroyed them to
#CYA, simply because doing so is "illegal"?1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @blue_wave_unite and
Here's the main point: if cutters are so confident that an
#MRI brain scan of a circumcised child won't show trauma, why not just repeat the experiment to prove their point? After all, isn't that what#science is all about? They're terrified that@DrTinari would be proven right.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @blue_wave_unite and
Agencies that fund medical research refuse to fund any research into the negative impacts of circ. In the U.S., there are 100 million men who would sue if ANY negative impacts of circ were published hence there is a massive suppression of medical info relating to the harm of Circ
1 reply 7 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @DrTinari @blue_wave_unite and
What about doing the study in Europe? You only need 1 patient. Would
@ProfessorFrisch help you get access to an MRI machine there? You are exactly right about why the corrupt US medical establishment refuses to support research into#circumcision harm, but that must be overcome.2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
The cohort would need to be wide and diverse to remove doubt and silence skeptics, and also measure difference between techniques (gomco, plastibell, mohel) Since there's no shortage of parents wanting to cut their babies' genitals, it shouldn't be hard to recruit.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Ideally, yes. But consider the many obstacles we're up against, most of them imposed by biased, hypocritical, unethical US medical "professionals" who are becoming ever-more desperate to give #circumcision the patina of legitimacy. Don't make the perfect the enemy of the good #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.