Sorry I started reading as if you were in support of fgm. FGM is mutilation. Nothing less, nothing more.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @pistolpaulieon
Ive spoken to both cut and uncircumcised and no loss of sensation in circumcised men.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @pistolpaulieon
It develpoed in the middle east to prevent balantis, infection from sand and dirt. I do beg to differ with women who lose the clitoral region. It would be equivalent to us losing our penis head where most sensation comes to enable orgasm.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulLee78908138 @pistolpaulieon
#Circumcision 1) wasn't "developed...to prevent balanitis [or other] infection" b/c it started thousands of years before the germ theory 2) reduces sensitivity in the foreskin to zero 3) isn't as extensive or invasive as Type IV#FGM, which is rightly & universally condemned#i21 reply 6 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @pistolpaulieon
Go away, the post is days old. Neonatal no bloody loss of sensitivity. Was to prevent balantis, study, I did. Dont bother replying. Just another push by the left to get their own way.https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160414114249.htm …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
If research is correct, circumcision removes the most sensitive part of the penis. You keep telling yourself what you need to to justify your desensitized dick. Oh and by they way, don’t tweet or reply about topics you’re not prepared to talk about.
#i2pic.twitter.com/xMlLpFkkBR
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Joe, did this guy delete his account? Over not being able to handle the #truth about #circumcision?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.