Those who would defend forcing #circumcision on a healthy child are themselves inevitably forced to argue that the part that is amputated - the foreskin - has negligible value. But there's no objective medical evidence that the foreskin has less value than other male anatomy. #i2https://twitter.com/flatbear/status/1190850139755204608 …
-
Show this thread
-
There are only 2 ways to resolve the resulting cognitive dissonance. Either 1) stop forcing
#circumcision on healthy children or 2) argue that the rest of the penis also has negligible value. Anyone doubting that circumcising cultures have already steeply discounted the inherent1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
value of the penis & of male children ought to consider: 1) how such cultures weigh the risk of injury to or even the loss of the rest of the penis or death as possible
#circumcision complications against the largely imagined & entirely prophylactic "benefits" of circumcision &1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread
2) how such cultures compensate men for injuries to other penis parts when #circumcision does go awry, even injuries that are obviously disfiguring or sexually debilitating. Men suffering such injuries too often get little or nothing from unsympathetic doctors, hospitals & juries
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.