Those who would defend forcing #circumcision on a healthy child are themselves inevitably forced to argue that the part that is amputated - the foreskin - has negligible value. But there's no objective medical evidence that the foreskin has less value than other male anatomy. #i2https://twitter.com/flatbear/status/1190850139755204608 …
-
-
value of the penis & of male children ought to consider: 1) how such cultures weigh the risk of injury to or even the loss of the rest of the penis or death as possible
#circumcision complications against the largely imagined & entirely prophylactic "benefits" of circumcision &Show this thread -
2) how such cultures compensate men for injuries to other penis parts when
#circumcision does go awry, even injuries that are obviously disfiguring or sexually debilitating. Men suffering such injuries too often get little or nothing from unsympathetic doctors, hospitals & juriesShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.