I don’t personally care whether or not someone chooses circumcise their son. But to pretend there is no medical advantage to circumcision is a lie, as is the assumption that it is always traumatic.
-
-
Agencies that fund medical research refuse to fund any research into the negative impacts of circ. In the U.S., there are 100 million men who would sue if ANY negative impacts of circ were published hence there is a massive suppression of medical info relating to the harm of Circ
-
What about doing the study in Europe? You only need 1 patient. Would
@ProfessorFrisch help you get access to an MRI machine there? You are exactly right about why the corrupt US medical establishment refuses to support research into#circumcision harm, but that must be overcome. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
While the mutilation of non-consenting male infants is everywhere deemed ethical by the US medical establishment, the circumcision of any child for the purposes of medical study has been declared unethical - another example of the logic dispensed by the corrupt AAP & the WHO.
-
Not quite right. Circumcising a child for purposes of a medical study is deemed ethical - indeed, it's encouraged - if the hypothesis to be tested is that
#circumcision does something wonderfully good - no matter how many times such hypotheses are proven false.#i2@AmerAcadPeds
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
