To be fair Rielle is likely just regurgitating the lies doctors have told her. But they certainly know the babies are not just “falling asleep”. Anybody with common sense should know that really.
-
-
-
Replying to @skepticalrielle @iamscottee and
All of these “experts“ with their Google MD degrees are ridiculous. Medical experience is apparently no match for having a laptop.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @blue_wave_unite @skepticalrielle and
Int'l medical consensus is against you. As the president of Germany's pediatric society has said: “there is no reason from a medical point of view to remove an intact foreskin from underage boys or boys unable to give consent”
#i2 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316527603_Cultural_bias_in_American_medicine_the_case_of_infant_male_circumcision …https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316527603_Cultural_bias_in_American_medicine_the_case_of_infant_male_circumcision …2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @blue_wave_unite and
Moreover, the belief that an infant is able to fall "asleep" while having skin, smooth muscle, nerves & blood vessels amputated from his penis isn't just without objective medical support. It's a preposterous myth, clung to by cutters to make themselves feel better.
#i2#MedEd2 replies 3 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @skepticalrielle and
I don’t personally care whether or not someone chooses circumcise their son. But to pretend there is no medical advantage to circumcision is a lie, as is the assumption that it is always traumatic.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @blue_wave_unite @skepticalrielle and
Speaking as "someone's" son, I don't personally care to have been circumcised without my
#consent during my birth hospitalization. And only my opinion, not yours or anyone else's, is what matters when it comes to whether I should have lost a healthy part of my penis.#i21 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @blue_wave_unite and
That's
#Bioethics 101, & it applies without question to all other body parts. There is no justification or excuse for excepting the foreskin from the universal ethical rule that elective amputations require actual#consent of the actual patient himself - with "parental" or...1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @blue_wave_unite and
other surrogate approval or assent being of no validity or consequence. Your wholly unsupported & unsupportable comments about "medical advantage" prove nothing except your own reading comprehension deficiency. Most surgeries could be said to have some type of medical "advantage"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @blue_wave_unite and
if you look hard enough for one. To "pretend there is no medical advantage" to castration is also a "lie" - it would eliminate testicular cancer as a cause of death. To determine whether a surgery or other procedure should be recommended requires weighing the advantages or...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
benefits against the guaranteed harms and risks of harms. The world's MDs have done this for child #circumcision & overwhelmingly concluded that on any rational analysis, the harms & risks of child circumcision outweigh the advantages & benefits. That is a fact demonstrated...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.