@Hayward1979 obviously medical doctors completely disagree with you about there being no "downsides" to #circumcision, many of which can be catastrophic to a child. I shudder to think of where you've had to thrust your head to avoid confronting that irrefutable fact. #i2https://twitter.com/cooney21/status/1180345587272749056 …
-
-
Replying to @cooney21
I've just all of the credible research, that's all. And I have actually spoken to doctors directly about the issue, which you clearly have not
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hayward1979
There's no "credible research" suggesting there are no downsides to
#circumcision. The majority view among physicians (including the 38 who wrote this article) is that the risks & harms - i.e., the "downsides" - clearly outweigh the supposed benefits#i2https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/131/4/796 …2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
I remember being worried and doing a ton of research when my son was born. Would it be complicated? Painful? Nope! Simple 5 minute procedure, barely a peep out of my son, simple and fast healing. Absolutely zero downside So glad the option was available and very happy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hayward1979
Obviously, you're either lying about having done the research or you just don't understand it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
Nope, I did it. It’s good to educate yourself while being objective. Try it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hayward1979
You've done nothing but ignore the objective medical assessment of
#circumcision that's been sent to you. At this point you're just proving our point about your own cultural blindness.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cooney21
The objective medical evidence points towards health benefits today even moreso than it did in the past. It just keeps pointing in the same direction, and it keeps making you angrier.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hayward1979
"It keeps making you angrier" is a truly odd thing to say about a surgery you're supposedly endorsing as if it were a good thing. Obviously, the objective medical evidence is as I've presented it, not as you imagine it to be, so why should I be angry? You're projecting, Dan.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
Because you're constantly ranting and raving about banning it, while the evidence that it provides health benefits gets stronger and stronger.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
We're really just going in circles now, with me making points that are supported by ethics, reason, logic and medical evidence, and you, unable to refute any of it, making delusional claims you can't even begin to support. Are you sure you don't work for Trump?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.