You wrongly assume they would later decide to get themselves cut anyway, when there's absolutely no reason to think that. Most of the world's men are intact & more than happy to stay that way.
What's worse, you violated all 4 cardinal principles of #bioethics. 4 times. #i2
-
-
-
Replying to @poltimamiRN @ReliefBelief
Thanks for admitting you lack the ethical fitness to be an
#RN and cannot even begin to offer a medical, ethical, legal, moral or other justification for nontherapeutic child#circumcision b/c there is none. @AmerNurse2Day#nursing#nursingschool#MedEd#i2@AmerAcadPeds#ethics1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Oh look the “you don’t agree with me so you can’t do your job” fallacy. Not fascist at all.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, only one of us has the relevant objective standards - the 4 cardinal principles of
#bioethics - on his side. But don't just take my word for it: https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/medical-ethics/ … RNs who needlessly sever a healthy part of their sons' bodies are in no position to talk about fascism.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
If you want your penis to have a little smelly hat that’s on you. It’s not illegal so piss off already



1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @poltimamiRN @AmerAcadPeds
It's an irreversible surgery so obviously it's "not on me." It was a decision made by an unethical surgeon. If you weren't too ignorant & biased to be an
#RN, you'd know that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @AmerAcadPeds
Nice ad hominem. Incel. You blame all the failures of your dick on your mother?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @poltimamiRN @AmerAcadPeds
Your ignorance & bias is objective & palpable. It's not ad hominem to point that out. You know what's an ad hominem attack? Cutting off a healthy part of someone else's genitals w/out his consent.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @AmerAcadPeds
No that’s literally not what ad hominem is. Ad hominem is attacking the person and not their argument What is ad hominem is saying that in order for someone to be qualified for their Jobs they have to agree with your rabid hyperbolic opinions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Circumcising a child w/out medical need clearly is attacking him. Again, my pointing out how you have failed to act in accordance with objective, universally accepted standards of #bioethics - a point you haven't even attempted to refute i- s far from ad hominem.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.