That cutting off part of the glans is an inherent risk of #circumcision that occurs even w/out physician negligence, even in a 21st century hospital setting.
Forget the parental "consent" forms - parents need to read & understand MD defense statements in #circumcision lawsuits.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doctors lie all the time to protect themselves. And amputation of the penis tip isn’t even listed as a risk factor so a injury that severe would warrant a lawsuit for lack of “informed”consent. Informed being the risks. Consent being they did it without prenatal permission
-
Parental not prenatal sorry
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'd be willing to bet that 99.9% of the people that had planned on circumcising their newborn son would still choose to do it even after reading this article. If the possibility of accidental death isn't enough to make them reconsider. Why should this?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Amputating the foreskin of an infant should be a crime. Only quacks amputate healthy tissue from patient without that patient's informed consent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@liberal_party and yall still wont ban this barbaric practice.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The poor boy better get ALL the money in that lawsuit since it’s HIS life that is now ruined by this unnecessary damned procedure! Infant circumcision bans can’t come soon enough
-
In a case here in Denmark it was the parents who recieved the money, making circumcision profitable for them.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.