Explain to me this mom phenomenon: The same folks who say that circumcising is genital mutilation are the first to suggest cutting a baby’s tongue and lip ties so they can breastfeed better. There are more proven medical advantages to circumcision than breastfeeding.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @bethanyshondark
It is more like clipping an excess flap of skin than splitting someone's lips or tongue. If you had an excess growth of skin over your finger would it be mutilation to clip some of the skin? It isn't cutting off the penis it is an extra bit of skin
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MccollumRandall @bethanyshondark
Think about what you are saying here. Is every single infant born with an unnecessary "extra" body part? An abnormal growth of skin on a finger is exactly that, abnormal. Is having a penis as nature evolved it over tens of thousands of years an abnormity?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
There's no support for the proposition that the foreskin is an "extra flap of skin." It's normal, healthy, innervated & includes smooth muscle tissue & blood vessels (not just skin). To be born w/out a foreskin is to have a birth defect called aposthia.
#i21 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Well wrong on many accounts. Like I keep telling you guys. You pecker isn't small because of circumcision. It doesn't work that way.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MccollumRandall @cooney21 and
It makes it smaller...
#i2pic.twitter.com/nfp85SCQqZ
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Randall, even the most notorious proponents of circumcision realize it reduces penis size.
You haven't made a single valid, or even factual point. Pathetic. #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.