There's no support for the proposition that the foreskin is an "extra flap of skin." It's normal, healthy, innervated & includes smooth muscle tissue & blood vessels (not just skin). To be born w/out a foreskin is to have a birth defect called aposthia. #i2
-
-
Well wrong on many accounts. Like I keep telling you guys. You pecker isn't small because of circumcision. It doesn't work that way.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well right on every single account, as anyone who's actually informed himself about this subject could tell you: https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/the-prepuce/ … That removing the foreskin makes the penis smaller is so obvious you only show your delusion by saying otherwise. That's exactly how it works.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well you just went into lunatic territory. It in no was make it smaller. It is a sheath unless you are so insecure you want to count your sheath as your sword length. I guess you are.



2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Cutting on a very small infants penis is not easy. It happens more often than you'd think that too much skin gets removed. If a boy grows into adulthood and does not have the skin to allow for a full erection, that reduces size. This sort of thing causes a lot of pain as well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Out of the millions done how many are actually an issue? You do realize skin stretches right? You are really scraping the bottom of te nonsense barrel. Like I said your tiny pecker isn't because of circumcision. Just deal with it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
http://Mendocomplain.com http://www.circumstitions.com/Resent.html Many men have these issues and simply don't realise that they're problems because they think that this is how a normal penis is supposed to be. It is not. The links I posted show some of the men who realize that something is wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
So you list "some men" out of the millions? You are so desperate to try to make a point and don't see it is purely emotion and your own insecurity. Too funny
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
When "some men" are the ones able to understand & accept the facts (eg that the foreskin is part of the penis, that it is innervated, that it is functional) their opinion is worth so much more than those of men so desperate to defend their own cut penises they can't see the truth
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
A mole fits your same criteria. You git called out on your claims and keep coming back with nonsense. You penis is small because it is small. It wasn't the circumcision causing it. Just because you want a pecker than looks like a dog's is no reason to get so worked up little guy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
As I've already explained to you - with citation to medical authority - foreskin is functional, includes smooth muscle tissue, nerves, blood vessels and is half the surface area of the penis. If you think it can be compared to a mole, you've only shown how clueless you are. #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.