The evidence was presented in bossio/pukall study. They admit the limitations. The survey was to determine attitudes about circ. Since the bulk of folks feel good/neutral, only the polarized ends of the spectrum spend time on a “lengthy” online survey.
-
-
Replying to @tesslatweets
Again, you're making statements that find no support from the study, or anywhere other than your own imagination. Most men cut as neonates have a negative view of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
No a small portion of cut men oppose. The word lengthy was put quotes because it’s pulled from the study. The sentiment is expressly stated and anyone who reads the limitations portion of the study can know that. It’s funny u think u can lie while the truth is rite there
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21
The % of men who want to restore foreskin is = % of men who want it removed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets
Once again, that simply is not true, and is disproven by the very study we are discussing. The lengths to which you, as a cutter parent, will go to avoid the truth about circumcision are truly astounding.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cooney21
It’s not proven untrue. I’ve yet to see evidence that contradicts my above statement.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets
That can only be down to your own lack of reading comprehension. What is it do you think a "negative" view of circumcision means?
#i21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
You’ve yet to show that rate of men who wish to reverse circ is significant more than men who wish to have one performed. The intactivists are just loud about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets
The percentages of men who are unhappy with their circumcisions is right there in the study, but there's no end to your refusal to see the obvious. No one would dispute that those percentages are "significantly" greater than the percentage of intact men who want to be circumcised
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
It’s not representative of the actual population the research is interested in, and the research study here and elsewhere I have seen have been sure to outright say that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The only reason to think the study respondents might not be representative of the general population is that they are more likely to include both those strongly opposed and those strongly in favor. That's not a reason to think study %s don't reflect %s in the general population.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.