The US Armed Forces is violent when it is required to be violent, i.e., when it is defending the U.S. from a violent attack or the threat of one.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RastaPacific
And your tweet bringing up the US Armed Forces in a tweet about violent baptisms and non therapeutic circumcisions sounds like a convenient distraction. Do you think the baptism of that baby was violent or not?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RastaPacific
"Merely an immersion"? The force with which that baby was thrust, repeatedly, into the baptismal font, was entirely unnecessary, inappropriate, & unsafe. If the baby didn't have a concussion (or worse) from being treated that way, he's lucky. You ought to recognize that.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RastaPacific
And I'm talking about the baby that's shown in the video.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RastaPacific
Your circular bs notwithstanding, the video shows the use of physical force on an infant that is unnecessary, inappropriate & dangerous. Your tweets suggest you disagree with that, in which case, our having anything to do with one another, on twitter or elsewhere, is about done.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I haven't conflated anything. Do you disagree with me that the video shows the use of physical force on an infant that is unnecessary, inappropriate & dangerous?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.