See, the problem w/doing nothing every time someone points out the inherent wrongfulness of non therapeutic infant circumcision b/c you're afraid to be thought antisemitic is that you really do show religious animus when some imbecile turns a baptism into a shaken baby event #i2
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RastaPacific
You're correct: ritual genital mutilation is "non therapeutic," as I've said, although I suppose I could've been clearer - I mean it shows (or could show) religious animus if you criticize a violent baptism but not ritual circumcision. Does that clarify things?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RastaPacific
The US Armed Forces is violent when it is required to be violent, i.e., when it is defending the U.S. from a violent attack or the threat of one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RastaPacific
And your tweet bringing up the US Armed Forces in a tweet about violent baptisms and non therapeutic circumcisions sounds like a convenient distraction. Do you think the baptism of that baby was violent or not?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
They don't, & I never suggested they did.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.