You really have zero idea about circumcision. Very plainly, doctors will admit that the procedure is much less risky and much easier to do on an infant. The infant has stem cells and can heal with almost no scars without stitches. Adults cannot.
-
-
Replying to @tesslatweets @eshu321 and
Very plainly, doctors say that w/out any basis for it b/c they're afraid they might get sued otherwise. "Stem cells"? "Almost no scars"? I guess next you'll be telling me you gave the twins magic beans that kept
#circumcision from harming them. Everyone can see your ignorance1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cooney21
doctors use biology. I know u wouldn’t kno bcuz u don’t know a lot. But biology and evidence dictate their opinions. Stem cells are extractable from the foreskin. Naturally the young can heal faster and quicker because of their cellular advantage. Scars arise when circ is delayed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets
Every cut penis has an obvious, discolored scar, whether
#circumcision is delayed or not. "Stem cells" won't magically change that. Most MDs - those who use biology & aren't "strongly culturally biased" - say#circumcision isn't worth the risks/harms.#i2 https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/131/4/796.full.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
all that paper argues is “the skin has feeing so it matters” when it’s been proven that men have full sexual function circed. It also claims there is no evidence of STI reduction, when there is. American pediatricians understand the benefits outweigh the risks. They ain’t wrong
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets
You can't be a man with "full sexual function" if you no longer have a foreskin b/c you've zero feeling in it. It's illogical, ridiculous & only suggests you understand nothing about sex for you to imply otherwise. Do you honestly think sensation isn't a bodily function?
#i22 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cooney21 @tesslatweets
US
#pediatricians are wrong about child#circumcision helping to prevent STIs or anything else, which is why they no longer even try to defend the practice from those who point out they're wrong - namely, virtually every other#pediatrician on the planet. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/131/4/796.full.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
They have defended it by preserving the practice. Circumcision is akin to a vaccine.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801441/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets
LOL! For the gazillionth time, the int'l medical consensus is that child
#circumcision does not prevent the spread of STIs, a view that is supported by the ACTUAL experience with the campaign to circumcise for STI prevention since this biased & demonstrably false 2008 article.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
Since 2008 there has been more evidence, but also no countries abroad the US always state that their motive is political - “it isn’t ethical”. The focus is not on health as should be when coming from the medical community. Otherwise they would launch campaigns to protect foreskin
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
There's no evidence showing #circumcision is preventing the spread of STIs in sub-Saharan Africa, b/c STIs continue to spread like wildfire there, including in areas heavily circumcised by the ongoing decade-long circ campaign. Stop your Trumpian refusal to acknowledge facts. #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.