The population of men who resent their cut is about the population of men who opt for circumcision and wish it had been done in infancy.
-
-
Replying to @tesslatweets @JazhuStreaming and
Untrue. Men cut as infants, by far, have the lowest satisfaction rates compared to men cut as adults and intact men https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319635437_Attitude_Toward_One's_Circumcision_Status_Is_More_Important_than_Actual_Circumcision_Status_for_Men's_Body_Image_and_Sexual_Functioning … And those who think they're satisfied only think so because they're ignorant https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13691058.2017.1400104?journalCode=tchs20 … Almost no men ever want or need one.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @opticon9
I’ve already addressed 2x that the bossio/pukal study admit that the population studied was likely biased in an anti-circ skew. Can’t be taken for general population, who are not ignorant.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @opticon9
And as I've already pointed out to you multiple times, Bossio & Pukall say nothing of the kind. "Polarized attitudes" goes both ways, and the study undoubtedly included men who - like you - are desperate to defend the practice.
#i21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
Ur right there were a few who were biased in the other direction - namely the wealthiest, most educated group. But the bigger population was skewed to anti-circ attitudes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets
There is no evidence that anyone is "biased" or "skewed." The evidence is that significant percentages of all cut men, and a clear majority of those cut as neonates, view it negatively, while only 5.5% of intact men view that status negatively.
#i21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
The evidence was presented in bossio/pukall study. They admit the limitations. The survey was to determine attitudes about circ. Since the bulk of folks feel good/neutral, only the polarized ends of the spectrum spend time on a “lengthy” online survey.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets
Again, you're making statements that find no support from the study, or anywhere other than your own imagination. Most men cut as neonates have a negative view of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
No a small portion of cut men oppose. The word lengthy was put quotes because it’s pulled from the study. The sentiment is expressly stated and anyone who reads the limitations portion of the study can know that. It’s funny u think u can lie while the truth is rite there
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21
The % of men who want to restore foreskin is = % of men who want it removed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Once again, that simply is not true, and is disproven by the very study we are discussing. The lengths to which you, as a cutter parent, will go to avoid the truth about circumcision are truly astounding.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.