> Who says they don't want it? Science says they don't want it: men cut as infants have the lowest satisfaction rates compared to intact men and those cut as adults https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319635437_Attitude_Toward_One's_Circumcision_Status_Is_More_Important_than_Actual_Circumcision_Status_for_Men's_Body_Image_and_Sexual_Functioning … > due to the benefits and beauty There are no benefits, and mutilated penes are ugly.
-
-
Replying to @opticon9 @ReedNelson9 and
Lmao also did u know that study points out that the highest-educated and most well-off group were likeliest to get circed as adults? Largely made up of Europeans? And be happy because of it? Sorry the biases are too heavy in the study to prove anything.pic.twitter.com/3AJ1whE96K
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tesslatweets @ReedNelson9 and
You do realize that you just undermined your argument, right? You just reaffirmed that adult men who decide for themselves are more satisfied with getting circumcised than men who had circumcision forced on them as babies. Again, the study shows many men cut as infants are mad.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @opticon9
No the study was biased in general. Many who responded to the ads were polarized either in the positive or negative about circ. More neg than pos but the data as a whole is entirely skewed. But other data suggests that wealthier and better educated = more positive about circ
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @opticon9
There's no evidence "the data as a whole is entirely skewed." You assume that only b/c you don't like the results. You have no actual basis for believing the results don't reflect this reality: that most men who have
#circumcision forced on them in infancy view it negatively.#i21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
Hahaha omg no most men do not view it negatively. For every male polarized against circ, there is a male polarized for circ. Both are small groups. Most are in the middle and feel mostly neutral. The BULK of data shows that. A minutiae of data confirms ur bias.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets
You have absolutely no basis for this view, which is obviously contradicted by the research itself.
#i21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
The evidence is available via google scholar. Not to mention the wealth of anecdotal evidence - American circumcised men overwhelmingly choose to circumcise their sons.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tesslatweets
By "anecdotal evidence," of course, you're referring to what your own undoubtedly cut-from-birth husband thinks b/c he's failed to educate himself about - or to accept - the basic anatomical facts about
#circumcision. Seems you're the same way.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
No. Studies about circumcision all note that if the father is cut he will likely cut his sons - this is because it did not haunt or hurt the cut father. Therefore he continues the practice for its benefits.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No dear, it's because he believes the same myths you do (e.g., that the foreskin isn't really part of the penis & isn't really involved in sexual function) because the truth is just too horrible to face. Therefore he continues the practice to protect his ego & validate his penis.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.