You have a right to remove your own genital skin to save yourself 'work'. Nobody has the right to permanently alter another person's body, even our own baby girl/boy, simply to make cleaning them easier. Tell me, have you done this to yourself to save yourself 'work'? #i2
-
-
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @Noors18442121 and
Cutting in adulthood is costly and time prohibitive. Cutting girls in infancy isn’t possible. Male =/= female.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @ReedNelson9 and
Routinely cutting infants who don't need it or want it is vastly more costly and time prohibitive than cutting the comparably infinitesimal population of adult men who ever need or want a circumcision. Your logic does not compute.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @opticon9 @ReedNelson9 and
Who says they don’t want it? Male attitudes about circ in America are generally positive due to the benefits and beauty. My twins were circed in under a minute - combined. The only one who incurred cost was myself for opting in.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @ReedNelson9 and
> Who says they don't want it? Science says they don't want it: men cut as infants have the lowest satisfaction rates compared to intact men and those cut as adults https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319635437_Attitude_Toward_One's_Circumcision_Status_Is_More_Important_than_Actual_Circumcision_Status_for_Men's_Body_Image_and_Sexual_Functioning … > due to the benefits and beauty There are no benefits, and mutilated penes are ugly.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @opticon9 @ReedNelson9 and
Lmao also did u know that study points out that the highest-educated and most well-off group were likeliest to get circed as adults? Largely made up of Europeans? And be happy because of it? Sorry the biases are too heavy in the study to prove anything.pic.twitter.com/3AJ1whE96K
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tesslatweets @ReedNelson9 and
You do realize that you just undermined your argument, right? You just reaffirmed that adult men who decide for themselves are more satisfied with getting circumcised than men who had circumcision forced on them as babies. Again, the study shows many men cut as infants are mad.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @opticon9
No the study was biased in general. Many who responded to the ads were polarized either in the positive or negative about circ. More neg than pos but the data as a whole is entirely skewed. But other data suggests that wealthier and better educated = more positive about circ
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @opticon9
There's no evidence "the data as a whole is entirely skewed." You assume that only b/c you don't like the results. You have no actual basis for believing the results don't reflect this reality: that most men who have
#circumcision forced on them in infancy view it negatively.#i21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
Hahaha omg no most men do not view it negatively. For every male polarized against circ, there is a male polarized for circ. Both are small groups. Most are in the middle and feel mostly neutral. The BULK of data shows that. A minutiae of data confirms ur bias.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You have absolutely no basis for this view, which is obviously contradicted by the research itself. #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.