Actually baby’s do feel pain from the procedure.
-
-
Replying to @RockerMan_198 @tesslatweets and
You're absolutely right; newborn babies cannot be given the same anesthesia as an adult and often are given no anesthesia at all. Often the excuse is given that they "won't remember" the pain: http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/taddio2/ … https://www.iaim.net/extreme-trauma-from-male-circumcision-causes-damage-to-areas-of-brain/ …https://intactamerica.wordpress.com/2013/09/18/circumcision-and-rape-does-a-victims-memory-matter/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @eshu321 @GenIntact and
Comparing circ to rape isn’t a good look. Already so many of you propose we allow FGM when you’re practically pissing your pants from shrieking male circ is wrong. Hipocrisy! Sickos!
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @eshu321 and
We don’t support FGM just like we don’t support MGM.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @RockerMan_198 @eshu321 and
I’m glad to hear you say you don’t. Stop equation the two because it’s very confusing when you hear statements like “if you support circ then FGM is ok”
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @eshu321 and
It's clear all of us - including you - think both
#FGM &#MGM are wrong. It's also clear what you're experiencing is not confusion but horror at your own failure to realize this sooner.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
It’s really not clear. You bring it up with rapidity that FGM is harmless and less so that circ (in ur biased and no evidence opinion) and that it should be accepted simply because I accept circ. No! You shouldn’t even propose that if u care about body integrity. Sad!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets
It's clear I've never said
#FGM is "harmless." I've pointed out - based on irrefutable, incontrovertible anatomical evidence - that 1 type of#FGM, Type IV, is, objectively considered, less extensive, invasive & harmful than#circumcision.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @tesslatweets
You, Tessla, are the one stuck defending Type IV
#FGM b/c you insist on defending male#circumcision. Sad!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21
Hell no I don’t. I don’t support burning, cauterizing, using acid, introducing caustic materials, scraping, slicing, hacking, stitching, stretching or otherwise maiming genitals - all covered under type 4 which you ignore. “Any other mutilation not covered under the 1st 3 types”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And you don't support piercing or pricking them either - or have you changed your mind about that? Yet, in your insufferable hypocrisy you assisted in amputating healthy, functional & erogenous skin, smooth muscle tissue, nerves & blood vessels from your non-consenting sons. #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.