Good for whom? For you?? You realise you're talking of body parts you never had, never will, and not even can imagine how they feel and what they mean, yeah?
-
-
Replying to @andre__levy @cooney21 and
I can hear men. Read their responses. They tell you! Only a few men have ever said they wish they could have their foreskins. I’ve already made this point
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @andre__levy and
False. Hundreds of thousands of men are restoring their foreskins. That’s means it’s far more than just a few.pic.twitter.com/2nFqAKsxOI
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KyleChenIntact @andre__levy and
I speak about the stats which say that a small minority belong to that group. Sorry
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @andre__levy and
Wow. Way to shift goalposts. First you said few men wish they had their foreskins then shifted to saying it’s only a minority. If you can’t even own your words, why should anyone take you seriously?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KyleChenIntact @tesslatweets and
There's no reason for anyone to take her seriously b/c she's in complete denial, refusing to acknowledge the facts. She knows full well "the stats" as compiled by Bossio & Pukall show most men cut as neonates have a negative view of it.
#i21 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
Oh the one I already debunked because the authors admit that mostly those with polarized notions about circ would be the likeliest to submit to a lengthy online survey?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21 and
There have been other studies done on sexuality in general where circumcision is a question but not the focus and overwhelmingly attitudes are positive, then largely nuetral, with few negative.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @KyleChenIntact and
And how many of those viewing
#circumcision positively in those studies actually understood the facts about it at the time, & how many - like you - were laboring under ridiculous beliefs like it's not a "physical change"?#i21 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @KyleChenIntact and
Are you being purposely thick just to carry on? I think so, it’s quite obvious I was referring to no physical difference in sexual response between intact or not.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
What's quite obvious is that you've absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.