So I don’t heed Jewish books. You tools keep trying to equate FGM to circ - it ain’t the same. It’s wrong for the exact reasons you confuse male circ wrong - it’s whole purpose is to remove pleasure and chastise the girl so she will be “pure” for her husband.
-
-
Replying to @tesslatweets @andre__levy and
Then u think gotcha on religion. Ha! Gods word only says that man should cut himself to join in covenant and should cut those in his care if they are to join the man. There is no purpose beyond inheriting BLESSINGS. philosophers can wonder the intent but it’s plain in the book
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @andre__levy and
Health benefits - proven. Edge up? Not great enough to suggest cutting a boy if the parents perceive it as morally wrong or cannot afford or have other objections. Medically it was recomended until politically it was decided that boys should wait until adulthood and decide
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @andre__levy and
Sexual loss - men who are cut in infancy or adulthood do not experience a significant increase is the physical aspect. Men only experience a loss in the mental aspect when cut asfter adulthood.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @andre__levy and
Morally-as in bodily autonomy-is the only point of contention you have because it’s very subjective. There are some men who wish they could have been the one to consent or deny as infants. Statistically it is only a small group, that’s why parents choice needs to be left alone.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @andre__levy and
Cost is much lower in ALL aspects-physical, financial, sexual, risk, etc for infant circ than adult circ. Another reason for parent choice to be left alone.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21 and
How is the financial cost of doing something lower than that of not doing anything?? Makes no sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @andre__levy @cooney21 and
Reading comp owns you “infant circumcision vs adult circ”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21 and
That's a stupid comp; you simply discarded all the cases of NO circumcision in adulthood (the vast majority). In fact, "stupid" doesn't quite cut it; it's outright dishonest.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andre__levy @cooney21 and
The tweet was only speaking about infant vs adulthood circ. It’s very simple. Like your brain.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This has been explained to you many times, and even though it's very simple, you still fail to get it. Try reading it slowly this time: The overwhelming majority of intact men will never need or want a circumcision, so it's ridiculous for you to argue that infant circ saves $.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.