Infant circumcision is particularly insidious because the individual never had the opportunity to compare. Like being color blind or deaf all your life. The body compensates as best it can, but you really can't know what you are missing. #i2
-
-
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @cooney21 and
The body does compensate and most men who are circumcised never know the difference. America ranks with its competitors in terms of sexual fulfillment, our boys don’t seem to miss what they never had.
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @ReedNelson9 and
What they never *knew they had. As I've stated before, the more a man learns about the structures and functions lost during circumcision, the more likely he is to be unhappy about it.
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @JazhuStreaming @ReedNelson9 and
Perhaps in your experience, but that hasn’t translated into real numbers yet.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @ReedNelson9 and
So we should continue to violate the bodily autonomy of men until what.. ? What's done is done. All I'm interested in is getting it to stop. I left my boys intact, and the statistics suggest they will be happy that way all their lives.
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @JazhuStreaming @ReedNelson9 and
There’s no statistics that suggest that cut men are unhappy. Men will make decisions as fathers as to if they will leave their child intact if they feel their autonomy was violated by their parents.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @JazhuStreaming and
Do we need 'statistics that prove blind men are not unhappy' to prove why we shouldn't deliberately gouge the eyes of babies out? Absurd.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @GenIntact @JazhuStreaming and
When asked, circ men report either majority positive or mostly neutral. Few are dissatisfied.
7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @JazhuStreaming and
Kim & Pang surveyed men circumcised as adults, & far more actually reported worse sex life afterwards, & increased masturbation difficulty. You basically just did the equivalent of go into an anti-slavery group and chant, 'most black people are happy to be slaves!'
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GenIntact @JazhuStreaming and
Even though the men reported a perceived change, there was no physical resulting change. Same as uncut in terms of drive, erection, ejac, etc. no wonder that a man perceived there was a drop in pleasure after coming to know his body for 20+ years and then changing it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
There was a "physical resulting change" - they had their foreskins removed. And as you'll know from the Bossio & Pukall study that you continually ignore, most men cut as neonates have a negative view of it. You're just blatantly lying at this point. #i2
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.