It’s not forced. You’re very angry, please seek therapy.
-
-
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21 and
I'm in therapy, and your dumb if you don't think its forced cause its forced on babies they didn't ask for it they don't need it. Looks pretty forced to mepic.twitter.com/2emAAPVuGE
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @jak_jeremy @cooney21 and
It’s not forced, parents consent.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21 and
Parents dont live with the scar or the possible complications like I have to live with. Yes I'm fucking angry very much so I have painful erections for life and skin so thin it will tare during sex and it's because of circumcision
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @jak_jeremy @cooney21 and
Many would say circ makes the skin thicker so which is it? My husband was a part of the decision, in fact he is the head of house. He was circumcised. He has a scar. If you have pain seek a doc it can be fixed. Circ complications as rare as intact complications
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @jak_jeremy and
Did you just make up that 'fact' about circ complications being as rare as intact complications? Let's see your data sources. Many circ complications don't manifest themselves till puberty and are not recorded. Nobody died from being left intact. Babies die from being circed.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BSR163 @jak_jeremy and
People can be hurt from intact complications - which is why circumcision is the remedy in adulthood for phimosis and others. No fact of circ complications as rare are recorded and available. Do a google
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @jak_jeremy and
I don't need to Google. Complications with intact foreskins are pathology. When there is pathology, treatment is appropriate. However most pathology can be treated via non invasive means. Circumcision is always a last resort in intact cultures and therefore extremely rare.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @BSR163 @tesslatweets and
Performing irreversible reductive surgery on healthy infants without pathology is unethical. Doctors in developed countries outside USA do not recommend it or perform it routinely. There are significant risks up to and including DEATH. European Doctor:https://youtu.be/82uAAJZ2nXA
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @BSR163 @jak_jeremy and
It’s not unethical, almost never dangerous in US, and is a great tradition
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Baseless nonsense.
It is unethical: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/denmarks-29000-doctors-declare-circumcision-of-healthy_n_58753ec1e4b08052400ee6b3 …
It is dangerous (yes, even in the US): https://nypost.com/2018/11/02/mom-claims-doctor-botched-newborn-sons-circumcision/ …
It is an awful tradition that ought to end before the next boy dies: https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/10/26/secrecy-questioned-about-babys-death-after-circumcision.html …
What a trifecta of willful ignorance you've scored. #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.