I do not deny that there is a small circle of men in recent times that wish they could be uncut. I even acknowledged the personal revelation about your own experience and feelings. But speaking in totality, men don’t care & women receive no benefit at the cost of their sexuality
-
-
Replying to @tesslatweets @andre__levy and
Your non-denial comes only after assuming there weren't "statistics that suggest that cut men are unhappy." You then saw those stats, & grasped for unpersuasive reasons to doubt them. What you acknowledged is that my "right" to my intact body should've been but wasn't respected.pic.twitter.com/Tinzr7gjYp
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @andre__levy and
I don’t know how to be clearer, other than to say that for concise conversation you have to deal in generals. By “your right”, in that thread I was specifically recognizing your right to choose not to circ your children. It shouldn’t be mandatory although I believe it best
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @andre__levy and
LOL, what "could not be clearer" from our exchange is that in response to my post that unambiguously said non therapeutic infant
#circumcision is wrong b/c I always objected (& nothing about supposed parental rights), you said "it is your right."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @tesslatweets and
And when I then asked you about the violation of that right, all you could come up with "shit happens and life ain't fair." Not "it was your parent's right to cut you." I get why you've got poster's remorse about that though, now that you've thought through the implications.
#i21 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @tesslatweets and
1/3: Francis Bacon, pioneer of the scientific method, warning about the dangers of avoiding evidence that disagrees with an individuals's preconceptions:
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @cooney21 and
2/3: "The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it. And though there be a greater number and weight of instances to be found on the other side,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @cooney21 and
3/3: yet these it either neglects and despises, or else by some distinction sets aside and rejects, in order that by this great and pernicious predetermination the authority of its former conclusions may remain inviolate."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @tesslatweets and
The shorthand for what Bacon is describing there is "confirmation bias," and it clouds the judgment of every single person who supports non therapeutic infant
#circumcision. When you look only for what will support your pre-determined position, guess what you find?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @ReedNelson9 and
Okay dude, think you got me on a technicality, but if I’m explaining my position and you don’t want to listen? It’s on you. Look in the mirror when you speak of “confirmation bias”. Much research u provided goes against your own claims. Trolololol
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You've tweeted much, but not "explained" a single thing. You've ignored numerous requests to state your position on forcing Type IV #FGM on girls. You've failed to explain why the bioethical standards that apply to all other anatomy shouldn't apply to foreskin b/c you can't. #i2
-
-
Replying to @cooney21 @ReedNelson9 and
I’ve answered both but I’ll say it again - all FGM is torture because it poses not a single benefit nor is based in any religion as a benefit for women. Infancy is the BEST time to get the procedure done on every front there is to consider, so as a practice it’s best done then
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.