Neither do men's 'parts'. Retract, rinse, replace. What do you think he needs? A shamwow and a squeegee? If he's showering on even a semi-regular basis, he's as clean as a woman who showers on a similar schedule.
-
-
Replying to @JazhuStreaming @cooney21 and
Why the constant appeal to focus on hygiene? Why do medical professionals recommend hygiene training? Girls almost never have to be specially instructed. Even men admit they had to learn how to clean properly. HPV rates suggest they de facto aren’t.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21 and
All parents teach their children how to wash and clean themselves. How to brush their teeth and hair, how to shower properly, how to clean their ears. And you're the one arguing amputating genitals somehow improves cleanliness. I trust men to shower.
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @JazhuStreaming @tesslatweets and
Europeans keep their genitals clean, Foreskin is actually easier to clean than the Vagina, If you keep cutting that part of the body, you will never understand it...
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @Noors18442121 @JazhuStreaming and
I don’t make a big deal about cleaning the penis, although undeniably a circ is less material and less levels to trap material. No uncut men and inactivist women keep telling me that cleaning is an important part of owning the extra skin. I see a simple benefit to have less work
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @Noors18442121 and
You have a right to remove your own genital skin to save yourself 'work'. Nobody has the right to permanently alter another person's body, even our own baby girl/boy, simply to make cleaning them easier. Tell me, have you done this to yourself to save yourself 'work'?
#i21 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @Noors18442121 and
Cutting in adulthood is costly and time prohibitive. Cutting girls in infancy isn’t possible. Male =/= female.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @ReedNelson9 and
You think people shouldcut the penis of defenseless babies who can neither consent or object? The horrible, morbid truth is its sexual toture that damages both body and mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @jak_jeremy @ReedNelson9 and
They aren't defenseless, they have parents. circ is not torture, it is a rite
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @jak_jeremy and
"It is a rite"? So was human sacrifice, from the same time child
#circumcision began. So is#FGM, the actual facts of which you've avoided like the plague.1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
If parents stay uneducated about #circumcision, as so many in the US do, then their children are left defenseless. US MDs certainly won't protect them. And even a parent's adamant refusal to consent sometimes isn't enough to defend them, as I've already explained to you. #i2
-
-
Replying to @cooney21 @jak_jeremy and
Defenseless to what exactly? Also circ is not forcibly performed. It is an elective operation
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @jak_jeremy and
It's not an elective operation when the patient doesn't - because he can't - consent.
#i21 reply 0 retweets 6 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.