Familiar with it, it should not be practiced. Also entirely smaller than a males part, requiring almost no special cleaning instructions.
-
-
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21 and
Neither do men's 'parts'. Retract, rinse, replace. What do you think he needs? A shamwow and a squeegee? If he's showering on even a semi-regular basis, he's as clean as a woman who showers on a similar schedule.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @JazhuStreaming @cooney21 and
Why the constant appeal to focus on hygiene? Why do medical professionals recommend hygiene training? Girls almost never have to be specially instructed. Even men admit they had to learn how to clean properly. HPV rates suggest they de facto aren’t.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21 and
All parents teach their children how to wash and clean themselves. How to brush their teeth and hair, how to shower properly, how to clean their ears. And you're the one arguing amputating genitals somehow improves cleanliness. I trust men to shower.
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @JazhuStreaming @tesslatweets and
Europeans keep their genitals clean, Foreskin is actually easier to clean than the Vagina, If you keep cutting that part of the body, you will never understand it...
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @Noors18442121 @JazhuStreaming and
I don’t make a big deal about cleaning the penis, although undeniably a circ is less material and less levels to trap material. No uncut men and inactivist women keep telling me that cleaning is an important part of owning the extra skin. I see a simple benefit to have less work
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @Noors18442121 and
You have a right to remove your own genital skin to save yourself 'work'. Nobody has the right to permanently alter another person's body, even our own baby girl/boy, simply to make cleaning them easier. Tell me, have you done this to yourself to save yourself 'work'?
#i21 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @Noors18442121 and
Cutting in adulthood is costly and time prohibitive. Cutting girls in infancy isn’t possible. Male =/= female.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @Noors18442121 and
They have programs setup in Africa to circumcise adult men (who can consent). They have many advertisements saying how easy and quick it is. And even if it wasn't, you can't violate a person's human rights just to make it easier for another.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @Noors18442121 and
They need to convince the populace to get it done there, because it shows a MARKED effect on the spread of STIs Much of that continent would benefit from infant circ.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The campaign to circumcise sub-Saharan #Africa, purportedly to stop the spread of #HIV, has been ongoing for over a decade. Where's the real-world evidence that it's actually working (as opposed to making the problem worse)? #i2 #VMMC @WHO @CDCgov @PEPFAR @HillaryClinton
-
-
Replying to @cooney21 @tesslatweets and
Two words, "Risk Compensation". This effort is destined to be yet another dark chapter in the history of US/Africa relations. I've also heard of studies that supplying African's with soap and clean water do just as much to prevent disease.
#i21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @cooney21 and
Soap won’t wash away your HIV. Circ reduces many more HIV strains than the vaccines even prevent, and economically can’t be beat considering the supplies involved are basic and can be reused.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.