I've been doing this for ten years. You know how many women I've come across that will openly state they would not suck or fuck an uncut dick. Disc cheese is one of the most common phrases I see. Never mind the few I've come across who didn't even realise their boy was uncut ...
-
-
Replying to @JazhuStreaming @tesslatweets and
... until he arrived in the thread to set her straight. Also *dick cheese. It's too late for Twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JazhuStreaming @cooney21 and
Lol I know the feeling of too late but it’s mid morning USA. People are allowed to have sexual preferences.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21 and
And parents shouldn't be choosing them for their children. The adult that baby will become should be left his whole body to make that decision. For himself. It's *his* body.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JazhuStreaming @cooney21 and
Since it doesn’t affect his sexuality, helps reduce the risk of disease if he fails to use protection and has multiple partners (avg is 6), is 10x as costly and takes 7x as long to heal, presents much higher risk of complication as adult, the evidence shows its best done @ birth!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @JazhuStreaming and
It does affect sexuality. It is 50% of the penile skin and has more nerves than the head of the penis. Infants aren't at risk for sexually transmitted diseases, make your arguments to a consenting adult. If you can't convince them, don't resort to forcing it on a baby.
#i22 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @tesslatweets and
Seemingly getting away with reducing men's sexual pleasure without most men noticing (because they now can't compare) is hardly an ethical position to take to justify violating men's basic human rights.
#i22 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReedNelson9 @JazhuStreaming and
Similar saying it does affect sexuality doesn’t make it true. Modern studies (aka after the crash in circ in much of Europe due to loss of funds) that only concerned themself with sexuality have found that people in America have just as fullfilling, or slightly more so
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @ReedNelson9 and
The idea that removing erogenous, motile, sensitive tissue from half the surface area of the penis somehow doesn't "affect sexuality" is just absurd. There was never a "crash in circ in much of Europe due to loss of funds." Nearly all Europeans never circumcised in the 1st place.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @tesslatweets and
The exception is the UK, which stopped medicalized elective child circumcisions post-WWII, not b/c of "lack of funds," but b/c of research showing 10-19
#circumcision-caused deaths annually from 1942-1947. UK MDs correctly assessed the risks & benefits#i2 http://www.cirp.org/library/general/gairdner/ …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Other Europeans have never circumcised, & won't start, not b/c of "lack of funds" (look at their per capita incomes), but b/c they - & their sex partners - have firsthand experience of the value of foreskin. Studies based on self-reported experiences of people w/no experience...
-
-
Replying to @cooney21 @tesslatweets and
...of foreskin due to widespread infant circumcision are all but worthless b/c they can't compare/haven't compared their foreskin-less experience w/the alternative. Like the Aesopian fox who's sure the grapes he can never reach simply must be sour.
#i2#HisBodyHisChoice0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.