You always interpret data to suit your own preferences? How likely is an intact man to be happy in a society that tells him his natural anatomy is dirty and disease-ridden, and that a woman will reject him for possessing? How likely is a cut man to be in that society?
The idea that removing erogenous, motile, sensitive tissue from half the surface area of the penis somehow doesn't "affect sexuality" is just absurd. There was never a "crash in circ in much of Europe due to loss of funds." Nearly all Europeans never circumcised in the 1st place.
-
-
The exception is the UK, which stopped medicalized elective child circumcisions post-WWII, not b/c of "lack of funds," but b/c of research showing 10-19
#circumcision-caused deaths annually from 1942-1947. UK MDs correctly assessed the risks & benefits#i2 http://www.cirp.org/library/general/gairdner/ … -
Other Europeans have never circumcised, & won't start, not b/c of "lack of funds" (look at their per capita incomes), but b/c they - & their sex partners - have firsthand experience of the value of foreskin. Studies based on self-reported experiences of people w/no experience...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.