Tons of health benefits too. Prevents ocular cancer and porn addiction.
-
-
Replying to @AnimuTiddyLover @tesslatweets and
There! Prevents masturbation too! Where have we seen that before? Oh yes…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXq03GicS0w&t=28s …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @andre__levy @tesslatweets and
Cannot WAIT until every child rapist who does non consensual, non medically needed circumcision is brought to justice.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnimuTiddyLover @tesslatweets and
Ain't gonna happen. New laws can't be applied retroactively (and with good reason!). But if it stops going forward, I'd consider the battle won. And we're winnging! The US West Coast and Florida are pretty much won. Other than NE and MW US, Jews and Muslims, no one else does it:pic.twitter.com/mgTIs5BecL
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @andre__levy @tesslatweets and
Tides are turning, but it's not a full victory until circumcision is outlawed in cases where it is neither consensual or medically needed and we get tissue regeneration for people who were circumcised without their consent and who want their foreskins back. Intactivism will win.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AnimuTiddyLover @andre__levy and
It proves medically beneficial, so I see it keeping in vogue as an optional operation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @AnimuTiddyLover and
We'd eliminate breast cancer if we amputated breast buds in infancy. The reason we don't is that healthy body parts have value to their owners, & foreskin is no exception. The amputation of ANY child body part w/out medical need violates all 4 cardinal principles of
#bioethics.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @AnimuTiddyLover and
The reason we don’t is because we espect women to feed their babies wth their breast.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @AnimuTiddyLover and
With infant formula, there's no actual need for that, & so it's an entirely cultural expectation. So if parents make all the decisions for a child in childhood they can choose this too. When may we expect your view on the legitimacy of forcing Type IV
#FGM on girls?2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @AnimuTiddyLover and
Medically we know breast is best for growing babies, so no parents choose to cut out breasts. It’s also a significantly more complex area than foreskin. Your equivalencies are faulty, same for FGM. FGM and circ are not equal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The Type IV #FGM you've repeatedly avoided addressing is a pinprick to female genitals that only releases a drop of blood. Unlike #circumcision, it doesn't remove healthy tissue. By any objective measure it's not nearly as extensive, invasive or destructive as #circumcision.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.