No, she means patient-centered. Honestly, we don’t intervene to make the parents feel better. We really are here to take care of the children and we feel extremely passionate about it
-
-
CARES started a hashtag called
#parentalrights. Did you see it? Or this attached flyer, where they make it pretty clear that the parent's right to assign a gender to their CAH kids via surgery is in jeopardy? Who else would it be about, since the kids are obviously not consulted?pic.twitter.com/4pjtUxz9rD
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Sorry but -- surgery does not assign gender. Gender identity comes from the individual. And while doctors have no influence on gender. gender affirming care is known to be vital to mental health as learned from the transgender community.
4 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @CourtneyKRoweMD @erlohman and
So yes, I respect parents who are advocating to preserve choices and options for their children who are intersex just as I respect parents who are advocating to preserve choices and options for their children who are transgender.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @CourtneyKRoweMD @CourtneyKRowe and
They aren't advocating to preserve choices for their child, they are preserving their own right to make choices FOR their child. Hence the Parent's Rights garbage spewing from CARES. Rosie has her options preserved since she can still choose no surgery. Can they all say that?
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
As a parent, you also made a choice for your child -- choosing surgery and choosing no surgery are both choices. I am sure you did it with thought, care, consideration, research and a great deal of love. Other parents are asking for the opportunity to do the same.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @CourtneyKRoweMD @CourtneyKRowe and
I didn't make a choice, there was no choice to make. Rosie had no medically necessary reason to have a surgery, so we simply didn't have one. That's not a "choice". My non-CAH son Silas also didn't have genital surgery, but I wouldn't call that a choice.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes -
Sure it’s a choice! Let’s say you were choosing no circumcision for example. That means you’re choosing higher risk of UTI, higher HIV and HPV transmission, higher penile Ca risk. A very reasonable compromise for some families. But still a choice you make on behalf of your child.
43 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @CourtneyKRoweMD @CourtneyKRowe and
Agree. Lack of intervention is still a choice. It’s for sure the right choice for some but when dealing with nuanced issues ALL choices should be on the table
7 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @scotter @CourtneyKRowe and
GenerationIntact 👶 Retweeted GenerationIntact 👶
The "choice" should belong only to the owner of the genitals, when they're 18 & old enough to consent & understand pros/cons Not your genitals? Not your choice. And here are reasons REAL parents "choose" it:https://twitter.com/GenIntact/status/1107618501806690304 …
GenerationIntact 👶 added,
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes
Lots of "nuance" in some of those awful, ignorant replies
Can someone explain why the bioethical rules that apply w/out question to EVERY other healthy, innervated child body part aren't applied to boys' foreskins?
@AAPPres @AmerAcadPeds #tweetiatrician #tweetiatricians #i2
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Mike52400257 @IntactVoices and
That assessment is supported by the cardinal principles of medical ethics & statutory definitions of "abused child." What can the pediatricians on this thread offer in defense of the supposed
#ethics of non therapeutic infant#circumcision besides their ashamed silence?#i20 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.