-
-
Replying to @AndrewYang @StephenAtHome
Colbert was funny but Democrats have been arguing that politicians shouldn't be telling scientists they are wrong. This is a step in the wrong direction. Vaccines, climate change, sex education, etc.,
12 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
The science is clear: circumcision is medically unnecessary, harmful, and risky, with dubious benefits that are irrelevant to most populations and all of which are more effectively achieved via non-invasive means. Circumcision permanently ablates functional tissue. Ban it.
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
Comprehensive review of the scientific evidence, the American Academy of Pediatrics found the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks,
7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
That @AmerAcadPeds #circumcision policy to which you refer has "been graded by almost all other pediatric societies and associations worldwide as being scientifically untenable." -Wolfram Hartmann, President of Germany's Pediatric Society (see p. 13) #i2https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316527603_Cultural_bias_in_American_medicine_the_case_of_infant_male_circumcision …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.