-
-
Replying to @AndrewYang @StephenAtHome
Colbert was funny but Democrats have been arguing that politicians shouldn't be telling scientists they are wrong. This is a step in the wrong direction. Vaccines, climate change, sex education, etc.,
12 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Wrong. The science is not ambiguous: It is 100% harmful and has zero benefits.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
After a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence, the American Academy of Pediatrics found the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, but the benefits are not great enough to recommend universal newborn circumcision.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
What @AmerAcadPeds found was “the true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown.” How could they say the benefits outweigh them? Because it was their political, pre-ordained conclusion. The rest of the world's MDs disagree. #i2 https://www.littleimages.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Cultural-Bias-in-the-AAPs-2012-Technical-Report-and-Policy-Statement-on-Male-Circumcision.pdf …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.