The context: God is telling Moses what is & isn't permissible. The meaning: exactly what the words say. The Israelites may own slaves as inheritable property. But why don't you go ahead & tell us what you think they mean according to the GFV ("Garrett's Fake Version")
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Thanks for clarifying you haven't done your own translation, which is exactly what you suggested when you told us what was in - your words - "my version" of Leviticus 25:44-46. Are you going to tell us what you meant by "my version" of Leviticus 25:44-46?pic.twitter.com/xyyWVrOr0l
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @GarrettGarcia32 and
Or are you now ready to admit that your take on Leviticus 25:44-46 is completely lacking in textual or factual foundation, because the passage clearly refers to "slaves whom you may have" & who may be treated "as a possession" & as inheritable "property"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The point is that God is said to have set forth rules that are inherently & always immoral & harmful. While it may be "obvious" to you that slavery is wrong, 180 years ago many denied this based on Biblical endorsement of it. You're doing the same w/circumcision today.
#i21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Christ's was the last blood sacrifice. That's why child
#circumcision is not & never has been a Christian initiation ritual. Indeed, "if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no benefit to you." Galatians 5:2.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Paul would disagree with you of course, as would most of the world's Christians.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.