Because if God thought owning a slave and beating him (or her) to within an inch of his (or her) life was really that bad, he wouldn't have told Moses to do it. As someone who serves God and not man, you'd agree, right? Shouldn't you be campaigning to repeal the 13th Amendment?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Why don't we focus more on these words: "As for the male and female slaves whom you may have...they may be your property. You may keep them as a possession for your children after you, for them to inherit as property." (Leviticus 25:44-46.) Just gotta respect the word, right bro?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The context: God is telling Moses what is & isn't permissible. The meaning: exactly what the words say. The Israelites may own slaves as inheritable property. But why don't you go ahead & tell us what you think they mean according to the GFV ("Garrett's Fake Version")
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The problem w/many of the rules in Leviticus (& about which you've avoided answering my questions) is not that they're "strict" - it's that they're immoral & harmful. You admit that yourself when you say "obviously slavery is wrong."pic.twitter.com/sP38EXbaUR
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
How great that God Himself has told you that you can pick & choose which parts of the Abrahamic-Mosaic law you'll follow & which parts you'll openly flout b/c they "weren't directed towards us" for some unstated, unexplained reason. Other males deserve the chance to do the same.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.