This isn’t my opinion. These are facts. The vast majority of boys & men do NOT need to be circumcised.
-
-
https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/Newborn-Male-Circumcision.aspx … " The benefits of circumcision out weigh the risks." Thats strait from the academy of paediatrics. ... enjoy your penile cancer. My son is good.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Chinook87 @RobynsWorldd and
Your son is more likely to get breast cancer than penile cancer. And circumcised penises DO get penile cancer, normally on the Circumcision scar. You just removed functional erogenous tissue without his consent.
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @BSR163 @Chinook87 and
"normally on the Circumcision scar." [Citation needed] The foreskin has been shown to not affect sexual pleasure by many studies and his consent is irrelevant since parents are their child's consent, since the child can't.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alerted_Soul @Chinook87 and
2. Studies like Jenn Bossio's which got masses of media coverage but was fundamentally flawed and riddled with bad-science?https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2016/04/22/circumcision-and-sexual-function-bad-science-reporting-misleads-parents/ …
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @BSR163 @Chinook87 and
There are studies which show circ does have a -ve effect on the sexual experience of men AND women. The prepuce is a complex highly enervated double-folded structure providing a gliding sensation & protecting the glans from numbing due to keratinization. https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/40/5/1367/658163# …
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @BSR163 @Chinook87 and
It's absolutely disingenuous to say that male circumcision is at all the same as female ones, especially the no convincing literature exist to show female circumcisions being nothing but complication fueled messed. While male ones showed higher benefits and virtually no-
7 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alerted_Soul @BSR163 and
Any time an adult takes a knife and cuts off healthy, functional exogenous tissue from a child who cannot consent, resist or escape it is an assault and a human rights violation. Gender is not part of the equation. Your human body was violated upon the first cut.
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @DoulaCynthia @BSR163 and
This is what blows my mind. Someone is cutting off a piece of a boys penis. I mean, how are men ok with this?
4 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @RobynsWorldd @DoulaCynthia and
Because to most men treat it like cutting hair. If the thing you're cutting barely affects you sexual pleasure, your lose virtually nothing, and gain benefits, so there's nothing to get mad about.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
70% of men worldwide would never circumcise, precisely b/c it's clearly not like cutting hair. Hair isn't innervated. Foreskin is, and is also smooth muscle tissue & blood vessels. The int'l medical consensus is that #circumcision has no benefits that could possibly justify it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.