It’s a violation of the human right to choose how his/her body should look. Female circumcision was banned in 1998 because the mutilation was too traumatic and life-changing. Just because it’s normalized doesn’t mean it’s right. Men deserve to choose.
Oh, I see. So you'd agree that "[w]hen a slave-owner strikes a male or female slave with a rod...[and] the slave survives for a day or two, there is no punishment; for the slave is the owner's property." (Exodus 21:20-21.) Right? #i2 #ethics #meded #WhenCuttersAppealtotheBible
-
-
Because if God thought owning a slave and beating him (or her) to within an inch of his (or her) life was really that bad, he wouldn't have told Moses to do it. As someone who serves God and not man, you'd agree, right? Shouldn't you be campaigning to repeal the 13th Amendment?
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.