It’s a violation of the human right to choose how his/her body should look. Female circumcision was banned in 1998 because the mutilation was too traumatic and life-changing. Just because it’s normalized doesn’t mean it’s right. Men deserve to choose.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GarrettGarcia32 @BaileyMarcello
He created you with foreskin... yikes.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GarrettGarcia32 @BaileyMarcello
But it’s not. Foreskin won’t kill you. It’s been deemed a *cosmetic* surgery.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Many body parts can be removed w/out causing death. That doesn't mean removing them from a child is ethical. It's unethical to perform surgery on a child unless to diagnose or treat a presently existing clinical condition. Circumcision does neither.
#i2 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/95/2/314.full.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Thanks for admitting you're done w/out having made a single valid point in support of your entirely subjective, defensive & unsupported viewpoint or refuting any of the objective ethical & anatomical facts shown to you in response to your utter nonsense.
#i2#ethics#meded2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
"a valid enough point for me"? You're proving our point, as this just further illustrates your views are entirely subjective. A point is either valid or it isn't, & you're clearly not an arbiter of that.
Our points are supported by the objective, int'l medical consensus. #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.