Again, she acts on children out of spite for men. She made that clear with her own words. Nice try white knighting for her, but no dice, hon. All you've done is make her look weak and stupid for expecting others to fight her battles for her.
-
-
Replying to @Oneiorosgrip @GrumpyCatterman
White knighting for who? Did she? And why should I put stock in what you say? I simply told you to stop with the appeals to emotion how in the name of Zeus's butthole did you confuse that with defending whomever this person is?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GarrisonBpppg79 @GrumpyCatterman
You're not entitled to dictate what is discussed online on the basis of your own, personal sensibilities. You already discredited yourself by calling accurate description of an action "appeal to emotion" on the basis of your own reaction to the information. Get over yourself.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Oneiorosgrip @GrumpyCatterman
In such a way that was completely unnecessary and could potentially cause folks to become aggressive or even toxic towards the person you were speaking to
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GarrisonBpppg79 @GrumpyCatterman
Nothing unnecessary about describing cutting babies' genitals as cutting babies' genitals, dear. It's unnecessary to obscure the details of the behavior with a label you think sounds nicer. Your continued claim that it's a call for aggression is still an emotional appeal.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Oneiorosgrip @GrumpyCatterman
It has nothing to do with what I think it's a simple fact you didn't need to choose such emotionally triggering words, when the word circumcision refers to the same exact procedure. People would still have known what you were referring to
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GarrisonBpppg79 @GrumpyCatterman
This argument has already been addressed. You're labeling a description of what the procedure entails "emotionally triggering." That's a direct admission that knowing what it means reveals that it's wrong.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Oneiorosgrip @GrumpyCatterman
People having their children circumcised isn't wrong or unethical, it's a personal matter for THEM to deal with not one for YOU unless that child happens to be yours. You are trying to use your own political beliefs to justify minding business that is not yours
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
What you meant to say is that circumcision is a personal matter for the person circumcised to deal with - not one for YOU unless YOU are the one whose genitals will be cut. Trying to force others to be circumcised - yes, even "your" children - is minding business that isn't yours
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Even though he clearly identifies as a boy that's an example of a parent using force and that's the kind of issue you silly people need to be protesting against. That woman is clearly not doing what's in the best interest of her child, but what's in her best interests and has
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I suppose if you think amputating a boy's healthy foreskin is w/in a parent's discretion, you must think pricking a girl's genitals is as well? Or do you silly people think you can distinguish the 2 in a way not already debunked in this article? #i2https://quillette.com/2017/08/15/female-genital-mutilation-health-benefits-problem-medicalizing-morality/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.