There are so many inaccuracies in this article's disorganized & blatantly disingenuous description of - & desperate attempt to justify - the non therapeutic amputation of a child's foreskin ("#MGM") that it's difficult to know where to begin. #circumcision #i2 #HisBodyHisChoice
-
-
The claim that "[t]here is little if any psychophysical damage inflicted" by
#MGM is patently false. One recent study shows 64% of males circumcised as neonates view it negatively, & for good reason. It destroys a unique anatomical structure comprised of smooth muscle tissue... -
...nerves, blood vessels, skin & sebaceous glands that is an average of 15 square inches in an adult male. By denying that
#MGM "destroys useful, healthy tissue [and] inflict[s] immense pain," Dr Cranston reveals a degree of ignorance that is shocking to see in a licensed MD. - 16 more replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.