So many men wishing I had highlighted the harm of circumcision equally when I decried #FGM
Men need to lead the way in defending their foreskins & beyond, so I’m glad they are showing willing.
To this end, guard your balls, boys.
Don’t leave it to someone else.
@Ballstocancer
-
-
Replying to @AlisonMoyet @Ballstocancer
There is also a bit of a false equivalency. FGM is done specifically to permanently remove the ability to feel pleasure. That is not the objective of male circumcision. FGM is horrible and repulsive on a whole different level.
6 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
I beg to differ. It's precisely the reason that Kellogg did it - to curb sexual pleasure in boys - and girls. It caught on, sadly.pic.twitter.com/5aXUB89Ytx
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Consider what the leading bioethicist has said in this article. "FGM" denotes a range of acts varying in severity & invasiveness, some more than male foreskin amputation, others clearly not. Why not end all nontherapeutic child genital cutting?https://quillette.com/2017/08/15/female-genital-mutilation-health-benefits-problem-medicalizing-morality/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.