This study's authors "hypothesized that circumcised men would have lower HIV prevalence than uncircumcised men, and that lower HIV prevalence would be explained by those receiving hospital-based circumcisions." To the surprise of NO ONE...(cont'd) #i2https://twitter.com/intactamerica/status/1025380815587422209 …
#i2 The common sense, Ockham's Razor explanation of this study's results is that #circumcision doesn't reduce HIV risk b/c the part of the penis removed - the foreskin - naturally plays a role in the male immune response & so THERE IS NO "biological efficacy of circumcision...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.