"Some say foreskin protects the head of the penis and, without it, it becomes less sensitive. Most research doesn't bear that out."
How is it that foreskin (1) doesn't protect the glans & (2) its loss doesn't make the penis less sensitive even though it's highly innervated? #i2
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This article also misses the main point of the Danish Medical Ass'n, which is that non therapeutic infant circumcision is "ethically unacceptable" w/out any exceptions or conditions. #bias
7:57 PM - 31 Jul 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.